Epson · Textured Matte
Epson Watercolor Paper Radiant White
View warehouse inventory
Why we like it
A textured matte paper with a radiant white base for fine art-style prints.
Epson Watercolor Paper Radiant White offers a textured matte surface for prints with a fine art paper presentation. The 190 gsm sheet is an option when you want visible surface texture in a lighter medium than many cotton fine art papers. The 13 x 19-inch pack contains 20 sheets.
At a glance
- Textured matte surface.
- Radiant white presentation.
- 190 gsm weight and 11.5 mil thickness.
- 13 x 19 inches; 20 sheets per pack.
Where it works well
- Fine art-style photographic prints.
- Artwork reproductions where a textured paper is suitable.
- Portfolios and presentation prints.
Sizes and Epson product codes
| Size | Pack / roll | Epson code |
|---|---|---|
| 13" x 19" | 20 sheets | S041351 |
Select a size above for the current price and availability.
Questions before you print
Is Watercolor Paper Radiant White the same as a cotton fine art paper?
Do not assume papers with a similar texture have the same base or weight. Compare the specifications for the exact paper, including the 190 gsm weight and supported loading method.
Will this paper work with my printer?
Check the exact printer model, supported media thickness and loading method, not just the paper dimensions. Rolls also require the correct roll handling and core support. Tell Tricera your printer model and chosen size if you need help checking suitability.
Which ICC profile and media setting should I use?
Use the settings and ICC profile specified for the exact printer, ink and paper combination. Epson provides profiles through its printer support downloads. Follow the profile instructions and apply colour management only once in your print workflow.
Choose your paper with Tricera
Tell us what you print, which printer you use and the finish you want. We can help compare papers and formats for your work.
Similar papers
As Canada’s dedicated retailer of fine art and photographic papers, we’ve picked the closest alternatives and noted the key differences.
