Epson · Smooth Matte
Epson Presentation Matte Paper
View warehouse inventory
Why we like it
A general-purpose matte roll paper with a bright white base.
Epson Presentation Matte Paper offers a bright white matte surface for general printing and graphic presentation. The 172 gsm roll paper is distinct from the lightweight Presentation Paper Matte sheets. Check the roll width, core and loading requirements for your printer.
At a glance
- Bright white matte finish.
- 172 gsm weight and 7.5 mil thickness.
- 94% opacity.
- 82-foot rolls with a 3-inch core.
Where it works well
- General-purpose matte graphics.
- Presentation and display prints.
- Roll-fed work requiring a bright white, non-gloss surface.
Sizes and Epson product codes
| Size | Pack / roll | Epson code |
|---|---|---|
| 24" x 82' | 1 roll | S041295 |
| 36" x 82' | 1 roll | S041221 |
| 44" x 82' | 1 roll | S041220 |
Select a size above for the current price and availability.
Questions before you print
Is this the same as Presentation Paper Matte sheets?
No. The roll and cut-sheet products have similar names but different specifications. This page is for the 172 gsm roll paper; use the exact Epson code when comparing or reordering.
Will this paper work with my printer?
Check the exact printer model, supported media thickness and loading method, not just the paper dimensions. Rolls also require the correct roll handling and core support. Tell Tricera your printer model and chosen size if you need help checking suitability.
Which ICC profile and media setting should I use?
Use the settings and ICC profile specified for the exact printer, ink and paper combination. Epson provides profiles through its printer support downloads. Follow the profile instructions and apply colour management only once in your print workflow.
Choose your paper with Tricera
Tell us what you print, which printer you use and the finish you want. We can help compare papers and formats for your work.
Similar papers
As Canada’s dedicated retailer of fine art and photographic papers, we’ve picked the closest alternatives and noted the key differences.
